Analysis of Concepts Brought out by Marx, Smith, Mill and Walzer Essay

Analysis of Concepts Brought out by Marx, Smith, Mill and Walzer - Essay ExampleThese rights granted the citizens a level of indecorum but it was not sufficient. However, governments objected a second step to set a social check committee. Setting it up would ensure that the government did not use power to oppress its subjects. In addition, Mill describes a different era of governance when people believed that they come throughd liberty. This is the era when the citizens chose leaders who would represent their popular opinion in the government. The leaders represented the opinion and views of the citizens, keeping their personal views to themselves. Although the citizens felt more represented by this form of governance, it brought about the controlling power of the majority and this denied the self-cultivating autonomous soulfulness the right to exercise his or her freedom to hold and practice a different opinion from what the majority holds. Society exerts the compulsion on an in dividual to follow the opinion of the majority. Mill refers to this control as worse than that of tyrannies. According to Mill, society should not hold the majoritys opinion as absolute truth. The majority can be persecute at times, whereas the minority opinion is right. In most cases, accepting of the majoritys opinion is without intellectual (Jones 27). In addition, refuting of the minoritys opinion is without meaningful analysis. ... According to Mill, absolute liberty should be an materialization of ones conscience and should entail freedom of thought and feeling. In addition, one should have the liberty to express and make public his opinion as well as pursue his or her interests and fellow traveler freely with a group. Society should set each individual free to exercise creativity in thought and action. This will encourage diversity in society. Walzer expressed his views on the continuous struggle to achieve equality in society. In his opinion, there are many inequalities in the world because people give birth the things that they do not honestly deserve. A great majority of people having a lot of currency have not worked for it. Once they are in possession of money, they get access to a widely variety of goods and operate. Essentially, some people in possession of certain goods do not deserve them at all. Some doctors buy certificates without the right academic qualifications. Others get access to power because they have money. Walzer wrote his essay in response to Kristols ideas and questions (Jones 29). According to Walzer, equality is important in society and is achievable if distribution of goods and services depends on need and qualification. His illustration of the wealthy accessing medical services because they have money and not because of wellness issues shows the irony in society. It is clear that some people have access to services and goods they do not need. Logically, altogether the sick and not the wealthy should have access to me dical services. If services and goods are only accessible to those in need, a level of equality in society is attainable. Other goods should come into an individuals possession when they qualify to own them. In addition, one should work hard enough to