Sports Teams Regulating Social Networking

Disputes ar arising between immature media usage and sportsmans teams/leagues. Many of these disagreements be beca hold of new media events practically(prenominal) as but non limited to Facebook, Twitter, Blogs, and youTube. The sports teams ar nerve-wracking to regulate the usage because they want to profit from the media. Their profit comes from their stimulate in-house media operation and, as in the case of the NFL, operating their own electrify channel. When non-regulated media is avail adapted to the public the sports teams risk losing a profit and having negative straighten out. benzoin Hickman analyzes, in the Old Law, New Technology The number one Amendments covering When diverts Teams and Leagues set almost to Regulate New Media, if the First Amendment chamberpot dictate to what outcome sports teams whitethorn regulate the use of the new media. Across the Pacific in Australia Brett Hutchins and David Rowe examine their countries media crisis between sport s teams and media. Reconfiguring Media Sport for the Online World An Inquiry into Sports, News, and Digital Media comprehensively states that with the growth of technology locations towards media usage need to develop with it.Media is being inf utilise into apiece aspect of our lives, especially entertainment arnas ex convinceable sports. For a sports team to non allow or restrict media reporting may only be holding the organization back. Allowing other teams, sports, and entertainment outlets to take center face and the valuable circumspection of fans and audiences. The younger audiences now want new mediums like blogging. Blogging is popular among sports fans and sports related media.The new wave of communication technology was jerky and Brad Shultz and Mary Lou Sheffer suggests that sports media isnt ready for the change in left over(p) Behind Local Television and the conjunction of Sport. research Article 1 Old Law, New Technology The First Amendments Application W hen Sports Teams and Leagues Attempt to Regulate New Media Benjamin Hickman examines the Fist Amendments piece to whether sports teams and leagues can regulate the use of new media by fans and the sign at sports events.Hickman examines the watercourse Fist Amendment textile explaining the capture of new media on twain sides. Hickman commencement ceremony reveals Brian Bennetts story, a reporter for The Courier-Journal in Louisville. Bennett blogged in real time, in 2007, close a baseball mealy at the University of Louisville. Bennett was immediately ejected from the press box and his press credential was revoked. Reporters covering our championships may blog about the atmosphere, crowd and other details during a game but may not mention anything about the game action.Any reference to game action in a blog or other eccentric of coverage could result in revocation of credentials, an NCAA official said in a statement to The New York Times. This is an attempt for the sports te ams to expect control. With the rise of new media their exposure had become exposed. Hickman observes how sports teams feel the need for complete regulation because of the influence that new media has on the press, fans, and the general public. Hickman describes a scenario where fans collaborate together using social networking sites to stage a walk out.This situation would be arduous for the sports teams to control if they werent able to regulate media usage. This is the risk that sports teams are trying to avoid. By managing all outlets of communication the sports teams are ensuring that they wont pee any bad PR mishaps. Research Article 2 Reconfiguring Media Sport for the Online World An Inquiry into Sports, News, and Digital Media The U. S. and Australia are similar in several(prenominal) aspects of media growth. Both Australians and American citizens are browsing websites, social networking, watch online videos, and make up a youtube account to name a few.All of these new technologies are becoming increasingly more popular and integral to our e actuallyday life. Brett Hutchins and David Rowe are both University professors who gathered evidence supporting the hypothesis that emerging media sport markets are characterized by complex interaction, tense competition, and awkward overlaps between pervade media and networked digital communications. This situation has disturbed the established media sport order and destabilized diametric organizing categories, including the commentary of sports intelligence operation (Hutchins).Hutchins and Rowe concluded that the fierce competition between news media outlets, fans, and sports organizations are because of the profit gained when audiences are watching. Sports teams used to not worry about coverage of their game because there was only one source used and available. However, with mobile technology this is becoming increasingly harder. Sports organizations in Australia and the U. S pull in been trying to a dhere by all restriction imaginable so that their profits wont suffer. In seeking to attract as many users as possible to their sites, sports organizations were accused by media organizations of unfairly confine the online activities of the news media and journalists and, in the process, attempting to dictate the shape, content, and even definition of news (Hutchins). Research Article 3 Left Behind Local Television and the Community of Sport Brad Shultz and Mary Lou Sheffer explain the technological shift in the sports world through their qualitative and quantitative data. They discovered that topical anesthetic idiot box system station are not engaged in sports blogging and see gnomish value in it.This may be the sign of traditional sports coverage changing and the sports community acting too reluctant to change. This resistance to change may be an indication that local sports television is abdicating its traditional role in the community of sport, which has primarily been d efined as the provider of local sports news to local sports audiences (Shultz). The defense against new media changes were apparent in both the qualitative and quantitative data. Their study asked professional journalists associated with a local media outlet in the sports section 15 questions and an open ended question petition their opinion on sports blogging. Results showed that out of 654 television stations truely religious offering a local sports segment within a newscast, 83 stations were involved in blogging (13%).This would seem to indicate, at least at the current time, that local television stations are not heavily investment in blogging in their sports content (Shultz). Hickman claims to look at all sides and opens up with a compelling story about a journalist ousted by blogging, however, he defends the sports teams side almost completely, with a resolution of new media pull up stakes cause dilemmas but in the end sports teams can regulate at their own discretion. To the extent that sports teams and leagues are seeking to protect potential sources of revenue, the First Amendment is unlikely to stand in the way. If, however, they begin regulating new medias use to prevent negative publicity from going viral, it is far from certain whether such action will survive First Amendment scrutiny. Hutchins and Rows facts started blanket(a) and then built up to the root of the problem, sports teams wanted the most attention of fans and audiences.However, the news media outlets are competition and now the burgeoning forces of the average fan on YouTube which pumps out unpredictably one hit wonders ever week. Hutchins and Rowe first jell out the challenges individually group face sports organizations want to maintain or improve the value of broadcast rights, contracts broadcasters struggle to establish complementary and harming online sites and distribution while fans and Users Access quality sports news and information in the face of plentiful online choice.When seeing every sides challenges and needs it allowed equal chance for all opinions. The data collected in this research article was very thorough and answered statistical questions not answered in the other two articles. Shultz and Sheffer were able to compile their findings using theoretical and industry rationales which revealed the sports organizations employees motives, and even reverences. The media landscape has changed so drastically in the past few years that it has created an environment of direful uncertainty (Shultz).These insights are exceptionally informative and allowed a balanced sense of all of the possible outcomes. Brian Bennett, a journalist who has gotten caught in the crossfire, must be especially confused because all he did was blog which sounds harmless. However, the current framework allows sports teams and leagues to regulate most of the speech at sports events. The reason why is because they make exclusive rights to TV and radio stations, sel l ads, and require reporters to have credentials.A few years ago, before social networking, this worked out fine and these regulations were not questioned. Although many are starting to question the current framework because of the fans and press easy accessibility to communicate online. Since the sports teams are trying to control every speck of correspondence about themselves when do we, as a people, have freedom of speech. Professional sports teams and leagues enjoy the luxury of regulating speech without implicit in(p) constraints because the First Amendment does not apply to them.Thus, from a First Amendment perspective, privately possess sports teams and leagues enjoy considerable freedom to regulate speech at sports events (Hickman). This is allowing each sports team have the right to be notified when a comment is make about themselves. I feel that this shouldnt be allowed and unless formally publishing your opinions, no one should be able to control that. The U. S. has th e constitution in which is the First Amendment, in striving to protect and better the lives of each citizen. However, at once again the U. S. as skewed the meaning of the document to benefit the imperium this time being sports organizations. Hutchins and Rowe simply explains that the government should not intervene and that each sports organization that wants to be involved with the new media craze should enter at their own risk. They also completely denounce sports and news media to be the equivalent content. In the case of both groups, news is treated as a malleable category, reflecting the self interest and identity of the speakers. Sports are demanding a rigid, content-driven definition of news defined in terms of time, features, and repetition.This formulation effectively divorces the technical foul characteristics of footage from any social and political function achieved by news, and dissolves the fact thateffective news media requires flexibility when responding to chan ging social conditions, commercial considerations, and technologies (Hutchins). The data collected by Shultz and Sheffer show a side that the other two research articles didnt. This is fear of change their quantitative research unmasked a community of life dogged careers used to doing the same thing and not looking for anything else. Sports is one of the expire areas of TV where people do things the way theyve always done them, says television executive Elliott Wiser, Today you have to have a new approach(Shultz). Unfortunately, those who ignore the new media changes will be left behind. The do something now attitude reflects the new media environment of an empowered audience. Interactive communication, participation in the sports dialogue, and the baron to create and distribute content have combined to make the consumer much more demanding in the evolving community of sport (Shultz).